Comparison of Two Different Scoring Systems in Encrusted Ure…

Established

13
Citations
0
Refs
2020
Year
Search Works
Work Details
  • DOI 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5516
  • PMID https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32406053
  • OpenAlex ID W3026050992
  • Type Article
  • Language EN
  • Published 16 May 2020
  • Volume 17 (3)
  • Pages 248–251
  • Source Urology journal./Urology jornal.
  • Publisher Shahid Beheshti University of Medic…
  • FWCI 1.55
  • Countries 1
  • Institutions 2
  • Added 29 May 2020
  • Updated 12 Oct 2026
External Links
OpenAlex Record DOI Resolver PubMed PDF Publisher Page
MENU
0

Comparison of Two Different Scoring Systems in Encrusted Ureteral Stent Management: A Single-Center Experience.

Article 2020 EN Diamond

PURPOSE: To report our single-center experience in encrusted ureteral stent management and to compare the utility of two different scoring systems, KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) versus FECal (forgotten, encrusted, calcified), in patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients who were found to have encrusted/retained ureteral stent and und…

13

Citations

0

References

2

Authors

1.55

FWCI

Citations by Year
Last 5 years
Topics
Keywords
UN Sustainable Development Goals
1 SDGs
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors
#AuthorInstitutionsORCID
1 Ekrem Güner Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim … (TR) Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
2 Kamil Gokhan Seker Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim … (TR) Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR) —
Related Works
10

Data: OpenAlex